Friday, 13 November 2020
And that is why I want to die
Tuesday, 28 July 2020
It's All the Same - Act Now
Sunday, 12 July 2020
Justice - Bleak Idealism or a Right worth fighting for?
It slithers from one broken tree branch to the other. The sound of dry leaves breaking under its smooth skin is so faint that it cannot mar the happy delusion of the creature trying to suck out some left out nectar out of a dead flower. The journey of a hopeful bud had to end as the last meal of a creature, unaware of its imminent demise. Whether the snake gets to devour the insect, the insect gets to suck the flower’s nectar, or the flower gets to be plucked by a beautiful dame, one thing is clear – none of this is or can be motivated by the idea of justice.
Justice is not something that we inherited from nature. It is something that was developed by humans alone, because our consciousness dictates that a civilization without justice will dig its own grave. Further, if your tribe includes only 40-50 people, it is imperative to maintain justice lest there will be no future of that tribe. However, as the size of the tribe increases, so does the pretence of justice. Moreover, the fear of evolution coming to a standstill is also diluted when the count of tribesmen in a civilization increase. If tribe A is not given justice and therefore, ends up perishing, tribe B has no problem with it because they can ensure the evolution of civilization.
However, the reason why justice even came to be is to counter ‘Might is Right’ philosophy. It does not make sense in any way to question whether the weak should get justice or not. Justice is a concept which was devised only for the weak and the voiceless. If everyone could ‘fight’ for justice, justice as a societal concept would hold no meaning. Then, justice would be a personal issue. It is part of the ‘social contract’ because peace is the only way forward and justice can be ensured only through peace. Implementing justice requires power for which we have police and the government.
Going with the assumption that justice is NOT an inherited concept for humanity but a devised concept to ensure survival and evolution, it is embarrassing that most of us indulge in victim blaming. Once a criminal is nabbed, everyone wants quick fix solution of death – but swift justice can never ever give voice to the voiceless. It just reaffirms the belief that justice is only for the powerful. The only way to get justice is by a vulgar display of power. “These criminals deserve this”
The only thing that this does is dehumanize a group of people. Once, as a society, we agree that ‘Mr. A’ deserves to be killed, we deem him and people like him less than others as humans. A divide like that will just increase the number of categories which aren’t ‘equal’. When America was dealing with school shootings there was a strong voice in PMRC which demonized heavy metal music. Now, once that is accepted as a norm ‘Kids who listen to heavy metal music shoot school children’ it becomes so easy to keep at bay, the idea of Justice for the artists because they are not musicians anymore, they are ‘harbinger of destruction’.
I do not believe that revenge as a personal emotion is a bad thing. The need for revenge is our primal instinct and it cannot be suppressed for an extended period. However, once revenge becomes a collective emotion instead of a personal emotion against the dehumanized, that’s a sure-shot way to anarchy.
I’m writing this article to show my dissent against the encounter of Vikas Dubey. It should not have happened. The politicians and civilians trying to mask this as some great victory of the police forget that police are there to implement the law. Law is there to ensure justice. And justice through law can come only and ONLY by strength. If you’re weak, you will kill; if you’re strong, you will nab the criminals and break the nexus of crime. Norway is a brilliant example of this. Now, I’m not naïve enough to compare Norway and India. Both are VASTLY different countries, culture and most importantly, have very different populations. But we could learn from Norway’s outlook on crime and criminals. Their jails aren’t the bleak houses of suffering and anguish that so many of our jails are. The idea is not to punish the criminal, it is show them that they can lead a life as rational members of society capable of performing their civic duties, without indulging in crime.
When a criminal is murdered as a criminal, the voice of people who support crime, who support violence gets even stronger. The voice of dissent against the murder of a criminal will always be more violent than the voice of dissent against the murder of a policeman not because the life of the former more important than the latter, but precisely BECAUSE the support for the former, the criminal, ONLY comes from violence, whereas the support for latter, the policemen, comes from a trust in law, order, justice, government and all the tenets of the social contract a peace-loving society must adhere to. Since the support for the policeman does not come from violence, the dissent against their murder will also not take a violent shape.
When we laud the murder of any human being – criminal or otherwise, we’re killing the idea of justice for the weak, justice for the poor. That kind of justice is dependent on the powerful supporting the weak in seeking revenge. That kind of justice will only encourage those who support criminals like Vikas Dubey to create more haters of policeman. I wish I could make this as clear to you, my dear reader, as it is in my mind – I DO NOT support violence, I DO NOT support crime and I BELIEVE that justice through the legal system is the only kind of justice that is worth anything. A criminal justice is an insult to a society that calls itself inclusive, secular, open-minded, peace loving and progressive.
I want to touch upon one more topic before I close this article. If you’ve stuck around this long, thank you for being tolerant of my opinions mentioned above. A lot of times when people use the word ‘racism’, they end up making some error in using the word in the right sense. Some may link racism to ethnicity, others to religion, even other to language and so on and so forth. And every time someone makes that mistake, they are attacked for not understanding the problem of racism, for diluting it by using the word ‘racism’ frivolously. There may be some things that I’ve said above that might be factually incorrect – maybe Norwegian jails aren’t as great as I make them out to be (my source is a documentary on black metal where noted black metal musicians recorded their albums from a jail cell, successfully), maybe the things that I spoke about tribes is not really the genesis of justice and so on. But as with the ‘frivolous’ use of the word ‘Racism’, I leave you with the following two questions:
Are the linguistic technicalities more important than the dissent against discrimination?
Are the examples and analogies around the concept of Justice more important than the conversation itself?
Thank You.
Saturday, 4 July 2020
Rebellion - Treacherous guide to an examined life
Friday, 3 July 2020
Blame
Sunday, 28 June 2020
A Game of Curiosity - Test your limits
Friday, 12 June 2020
Emotions - The power they hold
Wednesday, 3 June 2020
A society in symphony
Violin - considered to be the instrument that sounds most similar to a human voice, it's generally the lead instrument in Hindustani classical
Drums - well, drums
Flute - wind instruments, commonly used in morning ragas, very soulful instrument
The Poem
If I fly toward the stars, would you come with me?
Would you forsake your forest for an unknown tree?
I dream of symphonies, I dream of sonnets
Of ripples moving across this pond of consciousness
A world filled with colours I'd never seen in schools
Let me paint a picture of my dreams for you
I dream of bassline, murmuring of an elated time
As an old man holds tiny hands around his frail fingers
And with his selfless morality, his ethical values
The world of my symphonic dream gets its roots
I dream of violin, breaking the void
As a girl takes birth in a world of androids
And with her bow, she takes the world by surprise
They are human too, with her voice, they realize
I dream of drums, in the rhythmic chaos
Of a boy whose flight knows no recourse
And with his sense of wonder, the world learns
That time is just a signature of birthday candles
I dream of flute, and the glorious ragas
In the fruits of a hard day's labour of a father
And with the cloak of protection and security
The world learns of consistency and harmony
I dream of dulcimer, in its melodious urgency
Like the hurried care of a mother for her babies
And with her selfless benevolence the world feels
A little more tranquil, a little less lonely
I dream of guitars, I dream of hurdy gurdy
At the heart of distortion, a dexterous mystery
And with its mystic, optimistic tune
My world dances with the joy of equality and love
And then I wake up
I wake up to violence, wake up to deceit
To hunger and poverty and grief-stricken teens
To a war of colour and race and gender
Where hope for peace is a mind bender
As I look around I find myself
Taking part in the cacophony that betrays my dreams
Breaking down symphonic attempts of the brave
And silently subscribing to the murder of repentance
Let's join our hands and fight for a world
Where no harmonic dreams are subjected to pragmatic burns
As you place your head on that comfy pillow tonight
Pluck the strings of your heart for a future radiant and bright
Wednesday, 27 May 2020
..because staying alive is better than dying
I have forsaken this blog since 2018. Mainly attributed to my lackadaisical attitude towards everything that I try in life, I have recently learnt that my pessimism also has a part to play in this. I have always wondered the possible difference a few words on the page of a CA-cum-poet can make, where the page is not even known to enough people, let alone read.
However, I was reading this book - The virtue of selfishness by Ayn Rand and it has completely change my perspective towards life. The general feel of the book is - Motion is life, Stagnation is death and from that I interpret that every decision we take in life is just that - a choice between life and death. Invariably, I chose death over life at every instance.
Let me give you an example. You have to complete a book. Its your dream to write a poetry book and you have given yourself 50 days to complete it. Now, every time you don't work on the book and choose sleeping in or binge-watching a series on netflix or just going out to get drunk and come back, incapable of lifting a pen or pushing that power-button of your laptop, you are choosing death. You are choose ways of passive living, the kind of living that has no impact on yourself or your surroundings.
If you spend 50 days working on the book and the book is not completed you will still come out a lot smarter than your version of 50 days ago. However, if you just go out get drunk and come back, you can do it for 50 or 500 days, there will be no real growth to your personality, your perceptions or your profession.
Making that choice to work on the book or complete a 37 day exercise challenge or learning how to cook, ride a bike, play chess... all these things give a certain dimension to your personality and that will only happen if you're doing these things to do these things - i.e. you're choosing life - instead of doing these things to escape from doing other things - i.e. you're choosing an escape from this life.
Hence, I have decided to revive this blog because I can't see the premature death of something I created. Well, not anymore. So, this blog is less for the viewers and more for the writer - for me - because the person most affected by this will be me. I hope you find it worthwhile to spend your time here. But even if you don't, no pressure.
This blog will feature strong opinions about the government, meaningful breakdowns of song lyrics and insightful poetry about life and lots more. Stay tuned.